Discuss Detroit » Archives - Beginning July 2006 » From 9,900 dollars to 1.2 million in a two block radius? « Previous Next »
Top of pageBottom of page

Urbanoutdoors
Member
Username: Urbanoutdoors

Post Number: 81
Registered: 11-2005
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 3:16 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I was looking on realestateone.com at houses around boston edison and I found a huge disparity between the houses in Boston Edison and the houses 2 blocks outside of the historic district. 670 boston is going for 1.2 mill and 2 blocks away on calvert a 1,250 square foot bungalow is going for 9,900 dollars. I love detroits historic districts however I find it Ironic that you could buy over 120 houses for the price of 1 in that close of a proximity.
Top of pageBottom of page

Wilus1mj
Member
Username: Wilus1mj

Post Number: 154
Registered: 05-2005
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 3:18 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Is the 9,000 house falling down?...then you're just buying land.
Top of pageBottom of page

Fnemecek
Member
Username: Fnemecek

Post Number: 2124
Registered: 12-2004
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 3:31 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Jack White's house is in Indian Village.
Top of pageBottom of page

Dan
Member
Username: Dan

Post Number: 1323
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 3:32 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Heeee,

I thought of that, and deleted the post before you responded.
Top of pageBottom of page

Magnasco
Member
Username: Magnasco

Post Number: 186
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 3:43 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

And at this point "going for" doesn't equal someone paying that much.
Top of pageBottom of page

Urbanoutdoors
Member
Username: Urbanoutdoors

Post Number: 84
Registered: 11-2005
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 3:45 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Well that and the fact that if a neighborhood doesn't have a historic designation it seams to fall off the face of the city.
Top of pageBottom of page

Charlottepaul
Member
Username: Charlottepaul

Post Number: 64
Registered: 10-2006
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 3:52 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Also, and importantly, the houses and lot sizes in Boston edison are much much larger. Could be another reason for the disparity.
Top of pageBottom of page

Urbanoutdoors
Member
Username: Urbanoutdoors

Post Number: 85
Registered: 11-2005
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 3:58 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

well yes 670 boston is over 13000 square feet and on a huge lot. Still why is nothing done to the neighborhoods around the historic districts to make sure the decline is not so great in such a short area.
Top of pageBottom of page

Bussey
Member
Username: Bussey

Post Number: 389
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 4:01 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Well we live in this thing called a Free Market Economy so....
Top of pageBottom of page

Supersport
Member
Username: Supersport

Post Number: 10922
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 4:03 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)


quote:

Still why is nothing done to the neighborhoods around the historic districts to make sure the decline is not so great in such a short area.




What do you propose? The city has lost over 1 million people, population decline apparently still hasn't bottomed out. Do you feel it's the city's responsibility to stabilize a neighborhood when houses sit vacant? If so, how?
Top of pageBottom of page

Jams
Member
Username: Jams

Post Number: 4282
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 4:05 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I've considered a couple of homes just north of BE. The price was good but the barbed wire fences have given me pause.
Top of pageBottom of page

Wilus1mj
Member
Username: Wilus1mj

Post Number: 155
Registered: 05-2005
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 4:07 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Just put up industrial security fencing with the money you save living 2 blocks away from BE.
Top of pageBottom of page

Danindc
Member
Username: Danindc

Post Number: 1940
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 4:09 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)


quote:

Still why is nothing done to the neighborhoods around the historic districts to make sure the decline is not so great in such a short area.




It's not just a Detroit thing, believe-you-me. Best thing you can hope for is improving the already-decent areas, and stabiliziing adjacent blocks, and move outward from there.
Top of pageBottom of page

Goat
Member
Username: Goat

Post Number: 9006
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 4:11 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

^^^But it does take someone to be the first to do it. Think of how good you can feel if you are the catalyst for the regeneration of a neighbourhood!
Top of pageBottom of page

Urbanoutdoors
Member
Username: Urbanoutdoors

Post Number: 86
Registered: 11-2005
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 4:14 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I propose that there be more of a CDC/Nonprofit effort to keep surrounding areas from crumbling thus preserving the area to a greater degree than it is now. with a little of the money from the BE area being donated to a non profit, the results could surprise people. I do not mean that it will be a glorious historic district but it would be a much different neighborhood than one that is completely ignored.
Top of pageBottom of page

Dougw
Member
Username: Dougw

Post Number: 1454
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 4:26 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)


quote:

I propose that there be more of a CDC/Nonprofit effort to keep surrounding areas from crumbling thus preserving the area to a greater degree than it is now.



Sounds good to me. Get to work.
Top of pageBottom of page

Urbanoutdoors
Member
Username: Urbanoutdoors

Post Number: 88
Registered: 11-2005
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 4:30 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

A good example of a local cdc that is making things happen would be the one around Mr. Fofos they took control of that building rehabilitated it and now are putting Fofos in there as a tennant and they cleaned upo the neighborhood. I personally am trying to start one up in another area, I just am in the beginning stages figuring out if there are any other nonprofits working in that area.
Top of pageBottom of page

Magnasco
Member
Username: Magnasco

Post Number: 191
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 4:36 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

There is enough work right now in just keeping the inner neighbordhood areas from crumbling, much less the outer ones, with the Neighborhood NEZ being an example.

And btw there are great neighborhoods that are self sustaining without being historic, with East English village being one.
Top of pageBottom of page

Urbanoutdoors
Member
Username: Urbanoutdoors

Post Number: 89
Registered: 11-2005
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 4:48 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

true but the fall off is significant once you venture out of the really good detroit neighborhoods. Boston edison has one of the hardest times sustaining itself mainly due to the fact that the surrounding areas have declined so much if the outer neighborhood was in better condition there would be less work that would need to be done in BE.
Top of pageBottom of page

Chub
Member
Username: Chub

Post Number: 433
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 5:39 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Add to that the fact that a good number of people who live the Boston-Edison district don't actually make enough money to keep up the huge houses they live in.
Top of pageBottom of page

Urbanoutdoors
Member
Username: Urbanoutdoors

Post Number: 90
Registered: 11-2005
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 6:14 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Good point Chub
Top of pageBottom of page

Barnesfoto
Member
Username: Barnesfoto

Post Number: 2801
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 8:01 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

a good place for someone who likes BE but can't afford the monster houses would be the two streets that I consider "buffers" i.e. Glynn Ct and Atkinson. Beyond those streets it looks a bit dicey, although I have seen some renovated homes on streets further north.
I Looked at a Hud house in 1995 on Atkinson, it sold for 15k back then, 44k a year or so ago, doesn't look like much work was done on it in those ten years.

http://www.williamsauction.com /auction_detail.php?atype=r&id =2163
Top of pageBottom of page

Focusonthed
Member
Username: Focusonthed

Post Number: 661
Registered: 02-2006
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 8:47 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

That is one butt-ass ugly paint job.
Top of pageBottom of page

Urbanoutdoors
Member
Username: Urbanoutdoors

Post Number: 91
Registered: 11-2005
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 10:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Its not the worst house I have seen in the city.


96 Calvert St
Detroit, MI 48202
$ 9,900
3 Bedrooms, 1 Full Bath, 1 Half Bath
Year Built: 1910
Possession: IMMED
Subdivision: Voigt Park Sub (plats)
County: Wayne
Approx. Square Footage: 1,250
School District: Detroit
Taxes: $695
Dining Room: 11x11
Living Room: 20x12
Kitchen: 14x8
Master Bedroom 1: 19x12
Bedroom 2: 12x11
Bedroom 3: 11x9
Library: 11x8
Lot Dimensions: 40 X 124
image/x-jg
26183258_0h.jpg (11.7 k)
Top of pageBottom of page

Urbanoutdoors
Member
Username: Urbanoutdoors

Post Number: 92
Registered: 11-2005
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 10:24 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

and this is probably a steal at 1.2 mill for a fisher mansion but I don't think the value of this one has to go down. Just the surrounding area go up.
image/x-jg
26070135_0h.jpg (15.5 k)
Top of pageBottom of page

Jimaz
Member
Username: Jimaz

Post Number: 1089
Registered: 12-2005
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 10:39 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Those jpegs aren't coming through for me. Try the \image{Text description} format?
Top of pageBottom of page

Cman710
Member
Username: Cman710

Post Number: 29
Registered: 07-2006
Posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - 11:49 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

That $1.2 million mansion should be a steal. Think about it. You are getting a pretty unbelievable, historic mansion on a huge piece of property, on a gorgeous block. If you picked up that house and put it in ritzy areas in any other city in the country, it would be worth at least ten times what it is selling for now. (Consider how little you would get in the New York City metro area for $1.2 million!)

Unfortunately, since the surrounding area besides the immediate few blocks is not very good and crime is generally high, that dramatically brings down the value of the house. After all, if you can afford to furnish a house like that, you will have enough valuables in it that you are going to have to pay private security guards, or at least get some good guard dogs and a very expensive alarm system.

If I had the money, I would still consider buying that house. It's not everyday you can get a mansion like that for so little money. Unfortunately, I just finished graduate school and have lots of debt, though, so that's not going to happen!
Top of pageBottom of page

Gistok
Member
Username: Gistok

Post Number: 3156
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Wednesday, November 29, 2006 - 12:13 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Its funny how you mention Boston-Edison. But if you venture too far away from the 3 streets that make up Indian Village (but not by the West Village area), you encounter a similar scenario. Many of the nearby streets farther east are diamonds in the rough (to say the least).
Top of pageBottom of page

Charlottepaul
Member
Username: Charlottepaul

Post Number: 67
Registered: 10-2006
Posted on Wednesday, November 29, 2006 - 9:05 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

yeah, the Indian Village area is even more of in interesting case on this issue. West Village def. feeds off of the popularity of Indian Village, however, starkly different is East Village on the other side which for some reasons has not been able to do so. There are new homes in East Village but it is a slow start.
Top of pageBottom of page

Magnasco
Member
Username: Magnasco

Post Number: 199
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Wednesday, November 29, 2006 - 10:04 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Adding IV to the list is starting to point out that this is not isolated. Add Woodbridge to that list. The point is that they are all relatively small areas of nice homes with the surrounding neighborhoods struggling. The question is how do we support the whole of the city?

You are right in that the $1.2 million dollar is a steal, if it were somewhere else, but its not. It's value is tied to the surrounding neighborhood's value. So to make this work we need to not only make sure the BE area is doing well, but that the surrounding neighborhoods are doing well.

Also keep in mind that it is in the middle of a market that is still losing value, like most american cities, it's just that Southeast Detroit is moving at a faster rate. The mean price of a home is down 10.5%.

One problem with the home values is that all the folks with equity are selling short right now, and killing the comps. So even if a comparable house on your street sold for $200,000 within the last few years, if you get offered $145 for yours and can do it, you will. That is killing the comps.

And the comment about folks not being able to afford the upkeep is so on target. These large houses are becoming cost-prohibitive to own. I can barely afford to heat my 2400 square feet. I don't know how anyone, on a fixed income, can afford what I am paying, or more.

more later...

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.