Discuss Detroit » Archives - Beginning January 2006 » Detroit's rank among the Best Performing Cities 2005 « Previous Next »
Top of pageBottom of page

Bindetroit
Member
Username: Bindetroit

Post Number: 1249
Registered: 10-2003
Posted From: 69.215.79.21
Posted on Thursday, March 09, 2006 - 3:59 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The Milken Institute Best Performing Cities Index ranks 379 U.S. metropolitan areas based on their economic performance and their ability to create, as well as keep, the greatest number of jobs in the nation.

The top positions in the 2005 index are dominated by Florida metros, which hold not only the index’s top three slots, but five of its top six and 12 of its top 30. Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville is No. 1, followed by last year’s top scorer, Cape Coral-Fort Myers in second and Naples-Marco Island in third place.

The 2005 winners have similar characteristics: strong and growing service sectors, a robust recovery in tourism, growing populations and an increase in the number of retirees. As evidence, six metros in the top 20 come from the Southwest, including three in California (Riverside, Santa Barbara and Santa Ana) and two in Arizona (Tucson and Phoenix). The other is Las Vegas.

By comparison, the Midwest has none. The top-rated Midwest metro is Madison, Wis., at 35th. Nine of the bottom 10 spots on the index were from the Midwest – five from Michigan and four from Ohio – reflecting the region’s troubled manufacturing sector. Flint, Mich., is at the bottom at No. 200.

The index enables businesses, industry associations, economic development agencies, investors, academics, governments and public policy groups, to assess and monitor recent metro performance.

The Best Performing Cities index is outcomes-based. Its components measure job, wage and salary, and technology growth.

You can read the list at: http://bestcities.milkeninstit ute.org

So where's Detroit? Click on the list and then be prepared to scroll down. Way down. 192nd. Out of 200. That's down 6 more places than in 2004.
Top of pageBottom of page

Lurker
Member
Username: Lurker

Post Number: 1605
Registered: 10-2003
Posted From: 65.196.220.198
Posted on Thursday, March 09, 2006 - 4:22 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

#1 in the state! Take that, North of 8 Mile!
Top of pageBottom of page

Focusonthed
Member
Username: Focusonthed

Post Number: 31
Registered: 02-2006
Posted From: 209.220.229.254
Posted on Thursday, March 09, 2006 - 4:46 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Reading thoroughly owns you ;)

Holland-Grand Haven is 177
Kalamazoo-Portage is 169
Ann Arbor is 156
Top of pageBottom of page

Rustic
Member
Username: Rustic

Post Number: 2162
Registered: 10-2003
Posted From: 128.36.14.94
Posted on Thursday, March 09, 2006 - 5:22 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

All but one of the top 20 is booming either because of (1) a healthy dose of retiree relocation/vacation economy which represents burning previously earned money (not creating wealth but spending it) or (2) exurban growth near a worse ranking larger nearby metropolis (implying not net growth merely relocated stuff). (The exception: Washington DC which as a region is a revenue sink not a source, whee!)

Note: Detroit's big city company -- what Detroit's got might be catching ...
Detroit 192 (suburban Detroit areas ranging from 150s-190s)
San Jose 185 (yup silicon Valley and I believe that survey still includes a couple of years pre tech boom peak, so expect it to perform worse in the next couple of years)
Chicago 183 (hey I thought they have good public transportaton and attract all of the bright young go getters from the upper midwest? whats up with that?)
San franscisco 173 (again includes a couple of years pre dotcom boom peak expect worse performance)
New York 161 (I think this includes a couple of years pre 9/11 and pre sock market crash so expect worse performance)
Boston 157
Hou, SEA (UPS, MSFT WTF?), PHI, LA all in the 120s

Meanwhile anyone wanna compare the economic growth of ... oh I dunno ... China's Guangzhou (population 7+ million) to the economic dynamo of Central Florida? Oh nevermind our Secretary of state sez that Iran not China is currently the US's greatest challenge, whew all that worry fer nuthin. ... anyone wanna go to disneyland? can't afford it? Don't worry, ya can take out an interest only home equity loan and help the US economy grow grow grow.
Top of pageBottom of page

Lurker
Member
Username: Lurker

Post Number: 1606
Registered: 10-2003
Posted From: 65.196.220.198
Posted on Thursday, March 09, 2006 - 6:06 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)


quote:

Reading thoroughly owns you ;)

Holland-Grand Haven is 177
Kalamazoo-Portage is 169
Ann Arbor is 156



#1 East of Ann Arbor! Take that, North of 8 Mile!
Top of pageBottom of page

Lghart
Member
Username: Lghart

Post Number: 99
Registered: 03-2004
Posted From: 72.229.114.161
Posted on Thursday, March 09, 2006 - 10:24 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Rustic,

You hit it right on, I would not bet on the USA's future when our boomtowns are places like Orlando and Las Vegas, what happens when there is a real crisis in this country...being cynical that within ten years we're headed for a second great depression giftwrapped by GW Bush.
Top of pageBottom of page

True_blue
Member
Username: True_blue

Post Number: 39
Registered: 12-2003
Posted From: 205.188.116.137
Posted on Friday, March 10, 2006 - 12:09 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Good post Rustic. Very alert analysis. The Milken Institute's economic criteria is certainly not balanced. As a region, we continue to be victims of biased reporting and hidden agendas.

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.