Discuss Detroit » Archives - March 2009 » 'D' boosters flunk loyalty test « Previous Next »
Top of pageBottom of page

Realitycheck
Member
Username: Realitycheck

Post Number: 335
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Tuesday, February 24, 2009 - 10:17 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Tough times make for tough talk, even among business allies who usually don't disagree publicly.

The Detroit Metro Convention and Visitors Bureau surprised local marketing communication agencies by reaching outside its home region and home state to award a $100K+ contract to promote the D as a filmmaking location. The LA office of a St. Louis-based firm, Fleishman-Hillard, got the deal announced this month.

That amounts to business treason, two PR execs charge publicly.

"What happened to 'in the D?' " asks Sandy Hermanoff, head of a local agency asks this week in Crain's Detroit Business. "Shame on the Detroit Metro Convention & Visitors Bureau for hiring a firm outside the state. . . . Hermanoff Public Relations and many of the PR firms in this area are working very hard to boost our business right now. It would have been nice if some of us had been considered before going outside the state."

Don Tanner, co-founder of another agency, notes in the same issue:
quote:

"Two years ago, the bureau went to L.A. for creative work related to development of the “D” brand. . . . Who can know and promote Detroit better than those who live and work here every day?"

On his blog, Tanner adds:
quote:

At the very least there could have been a partnering between a firm with particular relationships in target markets L.A. and New York and a local agency.

Instead, it appears once again that Detroit is ‘not good enough’ — not even in the eyes of one of our own.

These folks have a solid point. "After all," as Tanner asks in Crain's, "isn't [promoting Metro Detroit] what they are there for?"
Top of pageBottom of page

Detroitnerd
Member
Username: Detroitnerd

Post Number: 3563
Registered: 07-2004
Posted on Tuesday, February 24, 2009 - 10:22 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I feel for local PR people, but I think I understand the Detroit Metro Convention and Visitors Bureau's intentions: Get somebody out there who KNOWS those people already to lure them in. There are two theories of PR: One is that what matters is a PR person's contacts, another is that what matters is their knowledge of the product. So I get why they'd hire an LA firm, at least initially. That said, it's amusing to think they've given themselves a PR black eye by hiring a PR firm. :-)
Top of pageBottom of page

Iheartthed
Member
Username: Iheartthed

Post Number: 3815
Registered: 04-2006
Posted on Tuesday, February 24, 2009 - 10:42 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

That "Let's meet in the D" campaign was a big fail. So if they spent money on an out of area firm to put that together, then maybe they should let a local take a stab at it...

ETA: They should get the firm that put together the "What happens in Vegas..." campaign.



(Message edited by iheartthed on February 24, 2009)
Top of pageBottom of page

Daddeeo
Member
Username: Daddeeo

Post Number: 475
Registered: 09-2008
Posted on Tuesday, February 24, 2009 - 10:47 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

How about the Roy Obrien, Faygo pop and Detroit Zoo
advertisers? Weren't they local?
Top of pageBottom of page

Russix
Member
Username: Russix

Post Number: 188
Registered: 11-2006
Posted on Wednesday, February 25, 2009 - 12:59 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"What happens in Detroit spills all over the country"

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.