Discuss Detroit » Archives - January 2008 » CNN: Bank bailout funds could be used for Detroit « Previous Next »
Top of pageBottom of page

Lmichigan
Member
Username: Lmichigan

Post Number: 3879
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 4:45 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Ha! Wouldn't this be ironic? George Bush giving Detroit money from the bank bailout that would have even less strings attached then the Democratic and Republican congressional loan packages. lol!

Congress, you don't messed up real good...

quote:

Bank bailout funds could be used for Detroit

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The proposal to loan $14 billion to Detroit's struggling automakers collapsed late Thursday night but the Big Three may get some money anyway.

Bush officials warned wavering GOP senators that if they didn't support the legislation, the White House will likely be forced to tap the Wall Street bailout to lend them money, two Republican congressional officials told CNN earlier.

This is a noteworthy change since the White House and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson have previously refused to use bank bailout funds to help General Motors (GM, Fortune 500), Ford Motor (F, Fortune 500) and Chrysler LLC.

The sources asked not to be named because of the sensitivities of private conversations.

.......

One of the sources said the a White House official made clear to a GOP Senator that would be the worst option, because the loan could go to the auto companies with few or no requirements along with it.



Can you even imagine the headlines? "Bush administration saves Detroit." How ridiculous would that be? The Republican caucus of the Senate could, in effect, have pushed the Detroit right into the hands of an even better deal. Ha!
Top of pageBottom of page

Lilpup
Member
Username: Lilpup

Post Number: 5001
Registered: 06-2004
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 4:55 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Levin said a long time ago that Paulson distinctly told him the TARP funds could
be used for the Big 3.

This has been all politics from the get go.

If they get the TARP money they can continue with the emissions standards lawsuit, too, along with the other companies.

(Message edited by lilpup on December 12, 2008)
Top of pageBottom of page

Lmichigan
Member
Username: Lmichigan

Post Number: 3880
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 5:08 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I know he said it, now it's time to go see if Paulson and the administration are good on their word.

BTW, this all to the backdrop that the government of Sweden is propping up Volvo and Saab to a tune of $3.4 billion dollars in a much smaller country:

quote:

Sweden gives Volvo, Saab billions in aid

STOCKHOLM, Sweden -- The Swedish government has decided to provide its ailing auto industry with a $3.4-billion support package.

The plan offers credit guarantees, emergency loans and research funds to boost companies in the "Swedish automotive cluster," the government said.



Boy, does Congress look stupid, now, if the administration is able to come through with the save.
Top of pageBottom of page

Lilpup
Member
Username: Lilpup

Post Number: 5002
Registered: 06-2004
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 5:25 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Everybody else has plans in place for either the builders or the buyers, or is working on one.

http://search.japantimes.co.jp /cgi-bin/nb20081211n2.html

http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/11 /08/bmw-eyes-german-bailout-fu nd/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11 /30/AR2008113002173_pf.html
Top of pageBottom of page

Lmichigan
Member
Username: Lmichigan

Post Number: 3881
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 5:37 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Yep, from what I can remember there's Sweden, France, Spain, Canada, Germany, etc...
Top of pageBottom of page

Goat
Member
Username: Goat

Post Number: 2891
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 12:36 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

First shoot all of the politicians, then the lawyers. After that the bank CEO fuck-ups.

Then build machines that have redundant safety devices) (like light curtains or gates and sensors...) and the people who kill themselves on those machines won't be able to breed.
Maybe our society will come away a bit smarter like we used to be. I am starting to think that we have dumbed down our society to the point of no return.

(Message edited by GOAT on December 12, 2008)
Top of pageBottom of page

Supersport
Member
Username: Supersport

Post Number: 2757
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 1:06 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"I've been around the world and found that only stupid people are breeding."

-Harvey Danger
Top of pageBottom of page

Johnlodge
Member
Username: Johnlodge

Post Number: 9003
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 1:57 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Meanwhile, the billions given to the financial sector with not 1/100th of the outrage continues to be given to high level employees in the form of bonuses.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories /2008/12/11/earlyshow/main4661 900.shtml?source=mostpop_story
Top of pageBottom of page

Mashugruskie
Member
Username: Mashugruskie

Post Number: 364
Registered: 09-2006
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 2:12 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Absolutely pathetic.
Top of pageBottom of page

Professorscott
Member
Username: Professorscott

Post Number: 1704
Registered: 12-2006
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 2:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Supersport, thanks - that's a cool song and I haven't thought about it in a while.
Top of pageBottom of page

Detroit313
Member
Username: Detroit313

Post Number: 761
Registered: 02-2006
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 2:44 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

So let me get this right-

If GM, and Chrysler go bankrupt, (I believe Ford is still sound, and has assets to sell) and they close plant, eliminate jobs ect...

And the Government doesn't bail them out, Then the Govt will be
DIRECTLY responsible for the recession.

Ahh- Just like ol' times-

<313>
Top of pageBottom of page

Crawford
Member
Username: Crawford

Post Number: 458
Registered: 10-2006
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 2:47 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Nope, the UAW is responsible. And the financial bailout is COMPLETELY different.

If you don't understand why AIG is different from GM in regards to maintaining global market liquidity, then there's really nothing else to say.
Top of pageBottom of page

Johnlodge
Member
Username: Johnlodge

Post Number: 9008
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 2:49 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

So how has AIG maintained market liquidity? Or are we still waiting? Will the million dollar bonuses they're giving their employees with our tax money somehow unfreeze the credit market?
Top of pageBottom of page

Novine
Member
Username: Novine

Post Number: 939
Registered: 07-2007
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 3:08 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"If you don't understand why AIG is different from GM in regards to maintaining global market liquidity, then there's really nothing else to say."

BS. AIG's role in the financial markets has nothing to do with the complete lack of oversight and their willingness to keep compensating people who drove that company into the position it is in. Only someone like yourself would even bother to justify their actions.
Top of pageBottom of page

Otter
Member
Username: Otter

Post Number: 455
Registered: 12-2007
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 4:07 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Crawford,

Your first posts in the other thread had a rather bad tone, but you did make some good points when you filter out the bile.

But it is, I think, insupportable to say that the UAW is responsible for the position that GM and Chrysler are in. That the wages and benefits they receiv are artificially high for what the market would bear is an impediment, but not the major cause of their being in their present position. Primarily, I think, it is bad management and management decisions, and short-term strategic thinking rather than long-term.
Top of pageBottom of page

Johnlodge
Member
Username: Johnlodge

Post Number: 9012
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 4:24 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The fact that Ford may not need any government money at all to survive the recession is proof that the UAW is not completely to blame.
Top of pageBottom of page

Goat
Member
Username: Goat

Post Number: 2908
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 6:10 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Folks, at one time GM & Chrysler could afford the lavish wages of the union. Today that is not the case. The credit crunch has cut themoff at the knees and the global economic meltdown has cut their production. Therefore the wages the unions still want cannot be afforded, at this time.
But GM should never have given such lucrative contracts in the first place.
Top of pageBottom of page

Angry_dad
Member
Username: Angry_dad

Post Number: 282
Registered: 02-2006
Posted on Friday, December 12, 2008 - 6:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Bob Lutz (and I paraphrase) said that during the hearings, when the subject of congress requesting Rick Wagoner be removed as CEO of GM would be akin to the Mayans throwing a virgin into a volcano to placate it.

Lutz had it right, sort of, instead of virgin, congress should be thrown into a volcano. Don't think the volcano would like it though.

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.