Discuss Detroit » Archives - January 2008 » GAR again « Previous Next »
Top of pageBottom of page

Busterwmu
Member
Username: Busterwmu

Post Number: 479
Registered: 09-2004
Posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 10:10 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

http://www.detroitnews.com/app s/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/200805 06/METRO01/805060364/1408/LOCA L

Good news!
Top of pageBottom of page

Spacemonkey
Member
Username: Spacemonkey

Post Number: 544
Registered: 03-2006
Posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 10:13 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Back around 1994, that building was going for $70,000. It has increased in price.
Top of pageBottom of page

Mackinaw
Member
Username: Mackinaw

Post Number: 4741
Registered: 02-2005
Posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 1:06 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Don't think, just do it. Approve that and let's move. Screw the Ilitchs for delaying the process for two years.
Top of pageBottom of page

Wpitonya
Member
Username: Wpitonya

Post Number: 76
Registered: 08-2005
Posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 1:10 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Definately. Didn't they have a year to start work, and if not, they lost the building?

Either way, if someone is interested in it and has had success redeveloping a downtown property before, why would the city council possibly say no? Besides incompetence of course.
Top of pageBottom of page

Dtowncitylover
Member
Username: Dtowncitylover

Post Number: 97
Registered: 02-2008
Posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 1:25 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The first time I saw this building I absolutely fell in love with it. I am so happy that someone will take the initiative to revive such a grand structure! Good luck to them!
Top of pageBottom of page

Gistok
Member
Username: Gistok

Post Number: 6777
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 1:37 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Only problem I forsee is parking. ALL of the parking within a block (or more) of this building is either owned by Ilitch Holdings, or Michigan Building owner Tony Pieroni. And with the Michigan Building at near capacity with tenants, he doesn't have parking spaces to spare.

That would leave either leasing space from Ilitch, or valet only parking to a distant lot.
Top of pageBottom of page

Rjlj
Member
Username: Rjlj

Post Number: 518
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 1:49 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gistok is obsessed with parking and is afraid to walk. Not all lots nearby are owned by Ilitch Holdings, or Michigan Building owner Tony Pieroni. There are others.
Top of pageBottom of page

Gistok
Member
Username: Gistok

Post Number: 6778
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 1:57 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Spare us your usual flippant comments Rjlj... I am just being a realist.

Perhaps you don't remember the problems with developing the Women's Exchange Buildling?

For years no banker would touch it because of a lack of nearby parking (Ilitch wasn't going to give a single spot for the building that he wanted demolished, but the courts said "no").

That's why more than one potential developments for that building (such as the never-to-be China Club) never came to fruition. It wasn't until Chris Chelios got some dedicated parking spaces from Mike Ilitch, that something happened with the Women's Exchange Building.

It's not as though you can have parallel parking spots around the GAR Building...

So, no, it's not that I'm afraid to walk... it's that banks will be asking the question... "where will people park?"

(Message edited by Gistok on May 06, 2008)
Top of pageBottom of page

Awfavre
Member
Username: Awfavre

Post Number: 243
Registered: 08-2005
Posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 2:00 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I know the Carleton family. Hopefully, their successes will continue.

I can’t wait to see their new offices! :-)
Top of pageBottom of page

Mackinaw
Member
Username: Mackinaw

Post Number: 4744
Registered: 02-2005
Posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 2:03 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gistok I wouldn't worry about it. They'll do what they need to do to get there share of the overabundance of parking on that side of downtown. I'm sure you've seen the pavement prairie over there.
Top of pageBottom of page

Gistok
Member
Username: Gistok

Post Number: 6779
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 2:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Mackinaw, I know they've got that sea of parking... mostly Ilitch parking. If Mike is intent on putting his arena there, then he's not going to ante up any spaces. He's not only buying up all the land between Cass and Park Ave., but also between Grand River and Cass.

We need to get VERIFIABLE to come up with an updated map of the remaining property in the area NOT owned by Ilitch. Based on his last map, there's not much left...
Top of pageBottom of page

Chris_rohn
Member
Username: Chris_rohn

Post Number: 439
Registered: 04-2005
Posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 2:25 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

He could work a daytime parking agreement out with The Leland. There is plenty of parking over there, Illitch Holdings or not.
Top of pageBottom of page

Mackinaw
Member
Username: Mackinaw

Post Number: 4745
Registered: 02-2005
Posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 2:46 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

One would think that once the arena announcement comes, which could be before development plans are finalized on the GAR, a lot of land will be freed up, and the value of the lots that are distant from the arena site will drop to where they should be.

I pray that Ilitch just goes with a few huge parking garages adjacent to the arena, so that this enormous quantity of empty parcels can be put to constructive use and a distinctive arena-district of bars and restaurants can be created.
Top of pageBottom of page

Gistok
Member
Username: Gistok

Post Number: 6780
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 4:21 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Mackinaw, I wonder why... with Ilitch putting a new roof on top of, and ventilation inside the Moose Lodge... he didn't make a go of it with the nearby GAR?

Chris_rohn, yeah I forgot about the Leland. And I wonder who owns the triangle parking lot between the Leland and Michigan Buildings?
Top of pageBottom of page

Dan
Member
Username: Dan

Post Number: 1539
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 4:47 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gistok is right, banks want to know were tenants will park, so this is an important question.

That said there are lots of possible options, as well as a number of street spots for short term parking.

I would love to see this happen!
Top of pageBottom of page

Vivadetroit
Member
Username: Vivadetroit

Post Number: 14
Registered: 04-2008
Posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 11:52 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Excellent news! Glad to see one of my favorite abandoned buildings is going to get new life.

There is always parking in the old Michigan Theater structure. Which leads to the question of.. do you think anyone would ever restore that part of the building? Where the theater was, not the office building.
Top of pageBottom of page

Sean_of_detroit
Member
Username: Sean_of_detroit

Post Number: 276
Registered: 03-2008
Posted on Wednesday, May 07, 2008 - 12:07 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Parking is not an issue. That spot is surrounded by parking lots. Some of those lots are expensive, but for sale. The area is also surrounded by unused (and unmetered) street parking. Remember, between all those parking lots is available street parking. The GAR is also surrounded by Park and Locks. Any parking needs could be rented for a decent price from them.

Plus, the GAR isn't THAT big. How much parking could it actually need?
Top of pageBottom of page

Fishtoes2000
Member
Username: Fishtoes2000

Post Number: 514
Registered: 06-2005
Posted on Wednesday, May 07, 2008 - 7:47 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I imagined the GAR tenants riding horses not driving cars.
Top of pageBottom of page

Xd_brklyn
Member
Username: Xd_brklyn

Post Number: 398
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Wednesday, May 07, 2008 - 9:45 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The only reason I can see that Ilitch dropped the ball on the GAR was that the terms of agreement between veteran groups and any new owners stipulated that it couldn't serve alcohol, so that negated any use of the building for entertainment or as a restaurant. Other than that the terms from the veterans were pretty light; a secure showcase displaying Civil War artifacts and some kind of plaque describing the original purpose of the building. Other terms like allowing the veterans access and the ability to meet in the building regularly were dismissed by the veteran groups themselves as unnecessary.

My brother was involved in the early negotiations regarding the GAR and always felt they were both pragmatic and respectful to both the veterans who served in the Civil War and to a future use of the building. With that small stage area in the building and the buildings unique design, it sounds like a natural fit for the media group. Glad to hear some news that shows promise.
Top of pageBottom of page

Beatsworking
Member
Username: Beatsworking

Post Number: 116
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Wednesday, May 07, 2008 - 10:04 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Model D did a little video on the Carleton's production company a while back...

http://youtube.com/watch?v=r-W 2bYgdJ6A

Definitely wish them luck with the GAR.
Top of pageBottom of page

Charlottepaul
Member
Username: Charlottepaul

Post Number: 2499
Registered: 10-2006
Posted on Sunday, May 11, 2008 - 4:05 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"I imagined the GAR tenants riding horses not driving cars."

"Their company and its 14 employees would relocate to the GAR Building if the proposal is finalized."

"...plans to invest about $2 million renovating it into space for a restaurant, offices, gift shop and exhibit space for Civil War memorabilia."

How much dedicated parking would something like that honestly require? 14 employees? Can't require that much. And a 'museum'--most museums in orban centers don't have dedicated parking.
Top of pageBottom of page

Mackinaw
Member
Username: Mackinaw

Post Number: 4765
Registered: 02-2005
Posted on Sunday, May 11, 2008 - 6:50 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Great points. Definitely don't worry about the parking getting in the way of this. Only for someone like Ilitch could parking or a perception of a lack thereof stimy a deal...oh wait, maybe that's what happened with their GAR deal?

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.