Discuss Detroit » Archives - January 2008 » News on 1001 Woodward « Previous Next »
Top of pageBottom of page

Lowell
Board Administrator
Username: Lowell

Post Number: 4560
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Sunday, February 24, 2008 - 11:47 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

From the current Crain's, Jim Papas is making news...
quote:

...Papas said, he's preparing to spend $3 million to revamp mechanical systems for 1001 Woodward, the former First Federal Building at Woodward and Michigan avenues, to ready it for office use.

Papas purchased the 23-story building last month for $5.5 million from a company set up by the Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Trust Fund, when the Macomb County developer who had bought it earlier defaulted on the land contract loan. That company, 1001 Woodward Office L.L.C., was controlled by Warren-based developer Lorenzo Cavaliere.

He also bought the attached 12-story parking garage by picking up a $14 million bank mortgage that also was in default.

While Cavaliere was proposing 128 condominiums in the building, with only a few floors of office space, Papas plans to offer all of the more than 330,000 square feet for offices, he said.

That building never made sense to me as residential.

Also noted...

Papas is also adding $3.5 million of renovations into the Atheneum. Competition from the new casino hotels is having its first positive effect.
Top of pageBottom of page

Ltorivia485
Member
Username: Ltorivia485

Post Number: 2991
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Sunday, February 24, 2008 - 11:54 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

This sounds excellent. We need more smart and creative minds in developing the city's downtown area.
Top of pageBottom of page

Hybridy
Member
Username: Hybridy

Post Number: 218
Registered: 08-2006
Posted on Sunday, February 24, 2008 - 11:54 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

i said it before, as soon as the monroe block got a proposal 1001 would come back online
Top of pageBottom of page

Detroitstar
Member
Username: Detroitstar

Post Number: 975
Registered: 01-2006
Posted on Sunday, February 24, 2008 - 11:59 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I know the downtown office market is pretty weak right now, but that is probably the most desirable location downtown right now. Can you so called "experts" tell me what the odds are that this has a positive affect on the neighborhood? Will it be possible that the increase in foot traffic might help out nearby Capitol Park.
Top of pageBottom of page

Mwilbert
Member
Username: Mwilbert

Post Number: 96
Registered: 11-2007
Posted on Monday, February 25, 2008 - 12:24 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Anybody fixing up a building is good, but in a weak office market you have to worry that they just pull tenants out of another downtown building. It is a pretty nice building, I hope they can pull tenants from somewhere else.
Top of pageBottom of page

Rjlj
Member
Username: Rjlj

Post Number: 473
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Monday, February 25, 2008 - 12:30 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Agreed Lowell, 1001 never made sense as a residential building. However, the challenge does exist in the near future as an office building. I hope he has the long term in mind.
Top of pageBottom of page

Hudkina
Member
Username: Hudkina

Post Number: 127
Registered: 12-2004
Posted on Monday, February 25, 2008 - 2:07 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

future home of Bank of America's regional offices?

hmmm...
Top of pageBottom of page

Gistok
Member
Username: Gistok

Post Number: 6346
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Monday, February 25, 2008 - 12:03 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I'm still waiting to find out where the $28 million that was supposedly spent redeveloping this building by a previous owner was spent on?
Top of pageBottom of page

Higgs1634
Member
Username: Higgs1634

Post Number: 342
Registered: 10-2005
Posted on Monday, February 25, 2008 - 12:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

the way I understand it, only a portion of the 28 mil went to the actual building...the rest (most) was for the parking deck.
Top of pageBottom of page

Eboyer
Member
Username: Eboyer

Post Number: 79
Registered: 01-2007
Posted on Monday, February 25, 2008 - 12:40 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hudkina, 1001 Woodward is not great for BOA.

Small floor-plates, not a renaissance zone, and generally an aesthetically unpleasant building.

If and when they come down, they will make a splash.
Top of pageBottom of page

Gistok
Member
Username: Gistok

Post Number: 6350
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Monday, February 25, 2008 - 12:52 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Although I'm no fan of modern, I do believe that 1001 is architecturally superior to One Kennedy next door. After all it's skin is made of granite (and glass). Few buildings are made of real stone anymore.
Top of pageBottom of page

Detx
Member
Username: Detx

Post Number: 106
Registered: 07-2007
Posted on Monday, February 25, 2008 - 9:39 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

When was 1001 originally built?
Top of pageBottom of page

Wazootyman
Member
Username: Wazootyman

Post Number: 314
Registered: 02-2006
Posted on Monday, February 25, 2008 - 9:49 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Built 1963-1965, designed by Smith, Hinchman & Grylls (modern-day SmithGroup)
Top of pageBottom of page

Gistok
Member
Username: Gistok

Post Number: 6355
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Monday, February 25, 2008 - 11:37 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Eboyer, I'm not so sure that Bank Of America would not consider moving to 1001 (if they are indeed thinking of moving).

First of all it is in the heart of downtown... can't find a better location... and then it was a bank building until recent years, so the space may be ideal for that type of use. It is modern enough to still be considered possible Class A space, and as I recall it has very tall floors, with floor to ceiling windows. And it may be just the right size for their needs.

And one last thing... BOA could end up getting quite a favorable lease.

It would also tower over the nearby Chase Tower, and would add some "ompf" to the name "Financial District".

Between the Chase Tower, One Kennedy, and 1001, 1001 is the most attractive of the three, IMHO.
Top of pageBottom of page

Royce
Member
Username: Royce

Post Number: 2566
Registered: 07-2004
Posted on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 - 1:13 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gistok, I agree with everything you said in your last post.
Top of pageBottom of page

Eboyer
Member
Username: Eboyer

Post Number: 82
Registered: 01-2007
Posted on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 - 9:10 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gistok, the key point is the fact that the building is not in a Renaissance zone. BOA is not moving to an area that is not deemed accordingly. Plus, I'm telling you, the floorplates are not large enough.
Top of pageBottom of page

Gpcharles
Member
Username: Gpcharles

Post Number: 11
Registered: 01-2008
Posted on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 - 4:12 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

1001 Woodward was built as the HQ of First Federal Savings & Loan of Detroit.

I worked there for 2 1/2 years. There are two "wings" to each floor connected by the central elevator lobby I would disagree that the floorplates are too small.
Top of pageBottom of page

Davecil
Member
Username: Davecil

Post Number: 5
Registered: 03-2007
Posted on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 - 4:16 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I hear he just hired an amazing detroit-based design firm to handle the marketing and identity of the building.
Top of pageBottom of page

Eboyer
Member
Username: Eboyer

Post Number: 85
Registered: 01-2007
Posted on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 - 4:36 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

GpCharles, how big are the floorplates, would you say? If they are under 55,000-60,000, they are most likely to small.

Remember, banks operate differently today than they did in the early 1960s.
Top of pageBottom of page

Rhymeswithrawk
Member
Username: Rhymeswithrawk

Post Number: 1141
Registered: 11-2005
Posted on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 - 6:33 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Anybody wonder what stood on the site of 1001 Woodward before it? I thought you'd never ask.
Here's a link to a video montage of photos I threw together. Sigh. I'd much rather have the Majestic Building than 1001 Woodward. Alas.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=tET oULBl-Xc

(Message edited by rhymeswithrawk on February 26, 2008)
Top of pageBottom of page

Charlottepaul
Member
Username: Charlottepaul

Post Number: 2358
Registered: 10-2006
Posted on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 - 6:49 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"There are two "wings" to each floor connected by the central elevator lobby I would disagree that the floorplates are too small."

"If they are under 55,000-60,000, they are most likely to small."

Neither of these comments are very close to reality. Typical office floorplates built these days are +/- 25,000 GSF
Top of pageBottom of page

Keystone
Member
Username: Keystone

Post Number: 275
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 - 7:08 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The building is in great shape. Lots of windows, exterior skin is all granite and in excellent condition. Most of the interior floors have been demo'd, clearing the way for new development. Some mechanical issues, but seems to be under control. Elevators are like new. The lobby is fantastic. If you're in the area, peek in and take a look. I personally think the style is as good as anything in the City. The ceiling of the lobby reminds me of the NBD lobby. (An AKA building) Very cool.

And, with attached parking, I think its a winner.
Top of pageBottom of page

Gambling_man
Member
Username: Gambling_man

Post Number: 1055
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 - 7:19 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Eboyer, how difficult do you think it would be for Jim to get it included in a Renaissance zone? I'm also not sure why that would be a hindrence anyhow?

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.