Discuss Detroit » Archives - January 2008 » Portable Bridge to Canada « Previous Next »
Top of pageBottom of page

Joebrazier
Member
Username: Joebrazier

Post Number: 9
Registered: 02-2004
Posted on Friday, December 28, 2007 - 9:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I have heard that in the event of a major disaster that immobilizes the Tunnel/Bridge, a portable military-style bridge exists that would connect Belle Isle to Canada and enable cross-border traffic to continue. Can anybody out there confirm this?
Top of pageBottom of page

East_detroit
Member
Username: East_detroit

Post Number: 1358
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Friday, December 28, 2007 - 9:57 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

What would be so important about getting to Canada that couldnt happen with the Blue Water Bridge?
Top of pageBottom of page

Detroitnerd
Member
Username: Detroitnerd

Post Number: 1725
Registered: 07-2004
Posted on Friday, December 28, 2007 - 10:06 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The PONTOONWAY!
Top of pageBottom of page

Jrvass
Member
Username: Jrvass

Post Number: 364
Registered: 01-2007
Posted on Friday, December 28, 2007 - 10:11 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

That would shut down river traffic?

I don't think so.
Top of pageBottom of page

Detroitnerd
Member
Username: Detroitnerd

Post Number: 1726
Registered: 07-2004
Posted on Friday, December 28, 2007 - 10:18 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Awww, another perfectly good idea destroyed by reality... :-(
Top of pageBottom of page

Livernoisyard
Member
Username: Livernoisyard

Post Number: 4674
Registered: 10-2004
Posted on Friday, December 28, 2007 - 10:22 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Swinging a pontoon bridge open and closed occasionally for scheduled river traffic is possible. But more likely, semi-trailers could be broken up and sent through the larger of the two rail tunnels and reconnected with tractors on the other sides.

Auto traffic would probably be restricted to government/military use. And ferries are another possibility.
Top of pageBottom of page

Detroitnerd
Member
Username: Detroitnerd

Post Number: 1727
Registered: 07-2004
Posted on Friday, December 28, 2007 - 10:27 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Interesting intermodal possibilities.

Although I kinda liked the sound of "PONTOONWAY".

C'mon! Imagine it said in an echoing monster truck voice!
Top of pageBottom of page

Lowell
Board Administrator
Username: Lowell

Post Number: 4398
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, December 28, 2007 - 11:25 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Interesting scenario but I would think they would pontoon near the Ambassador Bridge to be more tied into the traffic grid. Assuming the bridge footings were in place, they would provide important anchor points against the current.

However I could only imagine that happening if there was an actual battle theater in the vicinity.

Most likely it would be dealt with by ferries.

Nonetheless, it points out the need for big traffic crossing [non Moroun :-) of course]. If any of the crossings, the bridge in particular, were taken out it would be an economic disaster for our region.
Top of pageBottom of page

Hudkina
Member
Username: Hudkina

Post Number: 85
Registered: 12-2004
Posted on Saturday, December 29, 2007 - 1:37 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

There already is a ferry that connects Detroit to Windsor. It is located in Delray just south of Fort Wayne. Any truck that is carrying any type of explosives cannot use the bridge and must use the Ferry. Granted, a ferry isn't going to work for every truck. The most likely thing to happen is the trucks would either go through Port Huron or go around to Buffalo and cross there. There's no way in hell a "floating bridge" would be used as a temporary connection between the two cities.
Top of pageBottom of page

401don
Member
Username: 401don

Post Number: 179
Registered: 11-2007
Posted on Sunday, December 30, 2007 - 2:03 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

A terrorism attack on the tunnel or bridge is obviously not considered a serious threat by the geniuses in gov't or reverse customs would have been put into effect by now.
Top of pageBottom of page

Mcp001
Member
Username: Mcp001

Post Number: 3141
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Sunday, December 30, 2007 - 2:21 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Don't be too sure of that Don.

Their "intelligence" has been proven wrong in the past several times.
Top of pageBottom of page

Gistok
Member
Username: Gistok

Post Number: 6014
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Sunday, December 30, 2007 - 3:01 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I would think that the strong current of the Detroit River would make a pontoon bridge all but impossible, or at least require enough bridge reinforcement to make it very unlikely.
Top of pageBottom of page

Livernoisyard
Member
Username: Livernoisyard

Post Number: 4678
Registered: 10-2004
Posted on Sunday, December 30, 2007 - 3:11 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

I would think that the strong current of the Detroit River would make a pontoon bridge all but impossible, or at least require enough bridge reinforcement to make it very unlikely.


Not being a proponent of any pontoons, I reckon the addition of a few anchored barges on the downstream side of a pontoon bridge would easily afford any needed support.
Top of pageBottom of page

Charlottepaul
Member
Username: Charlottepaul

Post Number: 2171
Registered: 10-2006
Posted on Sunday, December 30, 2007 - 5:24 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"Nonetheless, it points out the need for big traffic crossing [non Moroun :-) of course]. If any of the crossings, the bridge in particular, were taken out it would be an economic disaster for our region."

Chances are, that if the crossings were taken out, Matty would get another bridge up and going faster than the government could...
Top of pageBottom of page

Mcp001
Member
Username: Mcp001

Post Number: 3143
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Sunday, December 30, 2007 - 5:49 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The Blue Water Bridges are under-utilized as it is.

If anything did happen to the Ambassador Bridge (just like it was mentioned above), traffic would just go up to Port Huron/Sarnia instead.
Top of pageBottom of page

Jenniferl
Member
Username: Jenniferl

Post Number: 416
Registered: 03-2004
Posted on Sunday, December 30, 2007 - 7:33 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I didn't know about the ferry. Is there one for pedestrians and regular cars, or just the one for trucks?
Top of pageBottom of page

Mikem
Member
Username: Mikem

Post Number: 3529
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Sunday, December 30, 2007 - 9:32 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

http://www.truckferry.com/

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.