Hans57 Member Username: Hans57
Post Number: 206 Registered: 05-2006
| Posted on Thursday, October 11, 2007 - 10:15 am: | |
Not exactly Detroit related. Apparently Detroit's not the most toxic city in the U.S. http://money.aol.com/bw/reales tate/most-toxic-cities-in-the- united-states |
Gsgeorge Member Username: Gsgeorge
Post Number: 229 Registered: 08-2006
| Posted on Thursday, October 11, 2007 - 10:19 am: | |
we're no. 8 though. 8. Detroit Contaminated sites: Approx. 1 for every 69 people 64,541 total (6th) Leaking storage tanks: 5,458 (5th) Corrective action reports: 70 (3rd) |
Hans57 Member Username: Hans57
Post Number: 207 Registered: 05-2006
| Posted on Thursday, October 11, 2007 - 10:24 am: | |
When I scroll through the list Detroit is not on there. Where did you see that? |
Oliverdouglas Member Username: Oliverdouglas
Post Number: 146 Registered: 02-2006
| Posted on Thursday, October 11, 2007 - 10:37 am: | |
Hans: it's a badly designed page, you have to do a lot of mousework to get to the full list. We're better off than Portland and Minneapolis? |
Gsgeorge Member Username: Gsgeorge
Post Number: 230 Registered: 08-2006
| Posted on Thursday, October 11, 2007 - 10:41 am: | |
AOL got the list from Business Week. The real article is posted here. If you click on their slideshow, you'll see that Detroit ranks at number 8. |
Hans57 Member Username: Hans57
Post Number: 208 Registered: 05-2006
| Posted on Thursday, October 11, 2007 - 11:00 am: | |
Well I'll be damned. At least were not first, and yes, Portland, land of splendor, beauty and progressive planning is worse than we are, ha ha. |
Raptor56 Member Username: Raptor56
Post Number: 130 Registered: 05-2007
| Posted on Thursday, October 11, 2007 - 11:03 am: | |
How does New york City not end up on this list? I can't imagine they are all that non-toxic. Same thing with Cleveland. |
Rb336 Member Username: Rb336
Post Number: 2803 Registered: 02-2007
| Posted on Thursday, October 11, 2007 - 11:08 am: | |
damn, i try to go to the BW site and it tries to download a "known threat" to my computer. evil evil site don't ever go there! oh, wait, i'm not bats |
Oakmangirl Member Username: Oakmangirl
Post Number: 516 Registered: 08-2007
| Posted on Thursday, October 11, 2007 - 11:38 am: | |
yes, Portland, land of splendor, beauty and progressive planning is worse than we are, ha ha. Look more closely at the numbers, not the over all ranking. Portland ranks worse than us because they have a lower population; it's a per capita stat. Thus, more residents there are affected because they have fewer people. Detroit boasts more contaminated sites and seven times more EPA corrective action reports required. Things aren't always as rosy as they seem. Ha, ha. |
Dds Member Username: Dds
Post Number: 389 Registered: 10-2006
| Posted on Thursday, October 11, 2007 - 11:47 am: | |
quote:it's a per capita stat Cripes. Here we go again. Let's see. If we air-lifted 200,000 non-polluting law-abiding people out of the metro area, would that make a difference in our rank? Wait. That's not right. Maybe I'll get back to you when I come back from Chicago where it's worse then here. |