Discuss Detroit » Archives - July 2007 » Architect Gunnar Birkerts appreciation thread. « Previous Next »
Top of pageBottom of page

Patrick
Member
Username: Patrick

Post Number: 4927
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, September 11, 2007 - 9:33 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

No one ever mentions the great architect Gunnar Birkerts. His work is internationally acclaimed and he is respected by the best architects across the globe. I figured I’d start an appreciation thread on this man and his work. He designed the Fed Reserve in Minneapolis as well as the Museum of Glass in New York. His local work includes the IBM Tower in Southfield, Domino’s Headquarters and an addition to the U of M Law School.

Here is an interesting interview with him and his thoughts on Detroit. He makes very good sense.

http://www.metrotimes.com/news /stories/cul/17/47/archit.html
Top of pageBottom of page

Oakmangirl
Member
Username: Oakmangirl

Post Number: 340
Registered: 08-2007
Posted on Tuesday, September 11, 2007 - 9:51 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Thanks for a breath of fresh air! This man, was a visionary when it comes to assessing our city core- sadly.

Any photo links; I couldn't access the UM collection?
Top of pageBottom of page

Kathleen
Member
Username: Kathleen

Post Number: 2476
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, September 11, 2007 - 10:09 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Don't forget his Calvary Baptist Church near the entrance to Elmwood Cemetery. You can't miss the orange church!!

http://www.thecalvarybaptistch urch.org/
Top of pageBottom of page

Mackinaw
Member
Username: Mackinaw

Post Number: 3662
Registered: 02-2005
Posted on Tuesday, September 11, 2007 - 10:49 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Domino's HQ is one of the worst pile of crap wastes of space ever.

Birkerts did the renovations about 3-4 years back at Blessed Sacrament Cathedral. His design works well; I don't think the cathedral is better off now, but that is totally the fault of AOD leadership and their decisions to rip it up, and not Birkerts.
Top of pageBottom of page

Neilr
Member
Username: Neilr

Post Number: 575
Registered: 06-2005
Posted on Tuesday, September 11, 2007 - 11:23 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gunnar Birkerts is my favorite living architect.

To me, 1300 is one of the finest high-rises in Detroit, the way the halves are offset from each other gives the building a great sense of thinness and elegance.

Calvary Baptist Church (see Kathleen's link), when I look at the angular orange roof against a clear blue sky, seems like a very large Ellsworth Kelly sculpture. It takes my breath away. The whole interior sloping wall that faces the congregation is paneled in mirrors which reflect the people back unto themselves.

I believe that his masterpiece is his light-fillrd underground addition to the U of M Law Library that he did in the 70's (I believe).

More recently, Birkerts designed the updating of Blessed Sacrament Cathedral on Woodward Ave. and Boston Blvd. The church, which was always grand, now has a plaza which leads folks from the rear parking lots to the front doors of the cathedral. While I am not wild about the new altar, what Birkerts did with the interior lighting beautifully illuminates the entire interior without casting harsh shadows.
Top of pageBottom of page

Gistok
Member
Username: Gistok

Post Number: 5310
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 12:13 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Thanks for the info Kathleen... and here I always humorously called that orange roofed church...
"Our Lady of Howard Johnson's"! :-)
Top of pageBottom of page

Lowell
Board Administrator
Username: Lowell

Post Number: 4139
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 12:54 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"Domino's HQ is one of the worst pile of crap wastes of space ever."

Blame Frank Lloyd Wright then. Birkerts translated a FLW design.

I like it although it could do without this Michael Jackson Neverland Ranch surround.
Top of pageBottom of page

Udmphikapbob
Member
Username: Udmphikapbob

Post Number: 455
Registered: 07-2004
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 8:14 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The Fisher Administration building at UDM McNichols is a Birkerts design. Supposedly it was nice at first, but the cladding on the exterior has not aged well. I think that, like most architects, he has a few portfolio pieces and a bunch of stuff he did to pay the bills. He's better than most.
Top of pageBottom of page

Detroitbill
Member
Username: Detroitbill

Post Number: 316
Registered: 09-2006
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 8:46 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I agree with Neil, Birkerts 1300 East Lafayette Co-op building in Downtown is a unique structure appearing very majestically across the area yet its thin appearance is interesting to look at. It has all the fittings of a true city/urban highrise with great uninterrupted views also. Most importantly it has become a great urban neighborhood to live in.
Top of pageBottom of page

Oakmangirl
Member
Username: Oakmangirl

Post Number: 341
Registered: 08-2007
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 9:11 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

lol, Lowell.
Top of pageBottom of page

Spartacus
Member
Username: Spartacus

Post Number: 228
Registered: 07-2005
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 9:46 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I had the pleasure of spending some time with Mr. Birkerts 8-9 years ago. He related a humorous story about the St. Louis Arch. As many of you know, there was a national competition to come up with the design of a monument in St. Louis. Mr. Birkerts was then employed at the venerable Eliel Saarinen architecture firm in Bloomfield Hills. Eliel has submitted a design and when word came that Saarinen has won a celebration broke out in their offices. It was only later that they discovered it was his upstart son Eero who had won, not his famous father.
Top of pageBottom of page

Rustic
Member
Username: Rustic

Post Number: 3161
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 9:52 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

From the article
The question is whether resettlement of downtown should even be done, then, whether it's proper to trickle in token residents where there are no real communities. No. I can't see the community aspect in a stadium-entertainment district. I don't think a strong community structure would be developed -- a school or a church.

It might not be right, then, to project people into the city now, as it is. I question whether we ought to be getting the soft flesh around these brutal places. I would feel sorry for the people injected into these areas.
Top of pageBottom of page

Rustic
Member
Username: Rustic

Post Number: 3162
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 9:58 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

That above quote oddly ignores the existing populated (and depopulated) residential neighborhoods of Detroit, but imo seems valid for the CBD.
Top of pageBottom of page

Burnsie
Member
Username: Burnsie

Post Number: 1146
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 10:36 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Birkerts also designed the UM-Flint Thompson Library, which has a spectacular curving glass wall that reflects the Flint River.
Top of pageBottom of page

Oliverdouglas
Member
Username: Oliverdouglas

Post Number: 117
Registered: 02-2006
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 10:48 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I had always assumed that the UDM Ad Bdlg was a student project, and that's why it was so ugly. Inside and out, its a forbidding structure.
Top of pageBottom of page

Rsa
Member
Username: Rsa

Post Number: 1264
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 11:42 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

the fisher administration building on UDM's mcnichols campus was originally designed to be twice the height it was constructed at. budget cuts took out several floors.

structurally it's quite interesting. the floors are mainly supported by the central core. the roof is actually a structural devise; it is tied in with the core, cantilevers out, and acts to support the facade/curtainwall and the outer most portions of the floors.

funny anecdote: the exterior was designed to match all of the other structures on the campus at the time. all of the other buildings on campus were black, thus the slate cladding. then, UD got a grant to clean the exterior of all of the buildings back to the original stone, which is a beautiful tan sandstone. the coal that UD had been burning for heat over 60 years had stained all the buildings black. that's why it seems to stick out like a sore thumb.
Top of pageBottom of page

Quinn
Member
Username: Quinn

Post Number: 1463
Registered: 01-2005
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 11:57 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

If I'm not mistaken, Birkerts was the architect for the original additions to the DIA.

I for one think they should have remained the dark, monoliths that they were. It was a distinct separation from the original museum because of the materials, and in creating that difference they paid homage to the existing renaissance masterpiece. They needed renovation and maintenance, not remodeling.

I'm not the biggest fan of the gigantic, booked marble up there now. Takes away from the original structure and is too "Disney."

This is, in my own negative way, a tribute to Birkerts. Ha ha.

Neiler, couldn't agree more about 1300 Lafayette. Drive by it every day and love it.
Top of pageBottom of page

Mackinaw
Member
Username: Mackinaw

Post Number: 3665
Registered: 02-2005
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 12:35 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I also agree that 1300 Lafayette is a fine building. Surely the nicest "tower in the park" on the lower east side...even though I don't agree with the tower in the park idea.

Domino's HQ is more the fault of Domino's than Birkerts. He was told to design something spread-out. While I maintain that it's ugly, it's biggest problem is its horrible land consumption and horizontal nature, and this was a decision of Monaghan and others. Ann Arbor could have had a 25 story exclamation point on its skyline; instead, a guy with a stupid vision commissioned a "ranch style" office building on a farm. WTF?
Top of pageBottom of page

Mccarch
Member
Username: Mccarch

Post Number: 135
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 1:18 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I'm sure that once the DIA opens its new incredibly-expensive wings, we will miss Gunnar's previous efforts. I really liked the square-doughnut stairways with the corner windows and the grooved-wood handrails.
Top of pageBottom of page

Quinn
Member
Username: Quinn

Post Number: 1464
Registered: 01-2005
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 1:22 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Birkerts DIA was a fantastic example of 70's contemporary with modern twists. It was great architecture with really good interior spaces and volumes. It just needed to be fixed up...it was shabby.

I too loved the stairways and those curtains! Well...they needed new curtains but that's no overpriced (I completely agree, Mccarch), over-designed, Johnson "masterpiece."
Top of pageBottom of page

Udmphikapbob
Member
Username: Udmphikapbob

Post Number: 456
Registered: 07-2004
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 1:25 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

thanks for reminding me, RSA, of the actual cladding story. it's been a few years since i was in school and heard it told. i knew there was something to it.
Top of pageBottom of page

Gistok
Member
Username: Gistok

Post Number: 5312
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 1:33 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I didn't care for the dark granite facades of the DIA additions. It so detracted from the main building. It made one think that these wings were separate buildings altogether. The Public Library across the street did a better job of integrating their new wings with the old.

Now that said, I did like the designs of the DIA wings, just not the exterior color.

We'll have to see if Michael Graves new designs to complement the old DIA wing make the changes worthwhile.
Top of pageBottom of page

Johnlodge
Member
Username: Johnlodge

Post Number: 2332
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 1:38 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

""Domino's HQ is one of the worst pile of crap wastes of space ever."

Blame Frank Lloyd Wright then. Birkerts translated a FLW design. "

Ahh ok, I always thought it WAS designed by FLW. That's what I had heard for some reason. So instead Birkerts took a FLW design and made it into Domino's HQ?

That place seems like it requires a lot of walking.
Top of pageBottom of page

Quinn
Member
Username: Quinn

Post Number: 1465
Registered: 01-2005
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 2:52 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It's funny but I respectfully and completely disagree Gistok. I think the current extremely veiny, bright-white marble detracts from the original.

BTW I know Michael Graves is the Architect (and may get kudos on the interior from me...don't know yet) but Philip Johnson was associated with the project at the early stages and, if I may be so bold in thinking/saying this as a follower of architecture, drove the booked-marble concept.

Love him too (as well as Michael Graves), but not this particular project.
Top of pageBottom of page

Burnsie
Member
Username: Burnsie

Post Number: 1147
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 4:23 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The black granite didn't detract from the original DIA. The original structure stood out just fine, even with the addition-- indeed, probably stood out MORE with the addition. There's no inherent need for building additions to have similar-looking materials to the original structure. They often CAN look similar and work well, but they don't always have be similar. The dark granite juxtaposed against the original Renaissance DIA building presented a pleasing and interesting contrast. One wonders if the party or parties that approved the new look took time to think about WHY Birkerts made his addition look the way it did.

(Message edited by Burnsie on September 12, 2007)
Top of pageBottom of page

Keystone
Member
Username: Keystone

Post Number: 265
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 4:34 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Birkerts' Federal Reserve in Minneapolis (now known as Marquette Plaza) is a very interesting structure. The floors are cable-supported, not just the roof as was the case at UDM. Somehow, though, the lightness of the structure is missing from the exterior, which looks like a massive hulking 1970's governmental building. The tower never worked well for the Fed, who moved out to other digs not too long ago.

Also, if anyone has seen Birkerts' UM Law Library, make sure you also see the sketches of what his original proposals were for the project. His 'brilliance' to go underground was dictated by the University after they flatly rejected his initial designs.
Top of pageBottom of page

Gistok
Member
Username: Gistok

Post Number: 5316
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 4:46 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Spartacus, thanks for the interesting anecdote about the father/son Saarinen competition in the 1947 St. Louis Gateway Arch competition.

Ironically both father and son were dead by the time the arch was built. IIRC, the father died in 1950 (already old), and young Eero died circa 1960 of a brain tumor at the prime of his life. Imagine what his legacy and architectural output would have been had he survived several more decades.

Quinn, unfortunately it's been quite some time since I've been past the DIA, so I can't comment on whether I like the new wings or not. Last time I drove by they were covered in protective covering.

I have a Michael Graves rendering of the an earlier more ambitious expansion plan, but it was deemed too costly.
Top of pageBottom of page

Southen
Member
Username: Southen

Post Number: 270
Registered: 08-2006
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 6:16 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I think the interiors of the new DIA will be improved, but Im not a fan of the exterior. The stone they used looks fake and not natural with the matching pattern on each stone. Add to that the gun-metal blue highlights on the skylights and I really dont care for it. If they had used a different stone, or different cladding altogether I dont think I would dislike it soo much.
Top of pageBottom of page

Mccarch
Member
Username: Mccarch

Post Number: 136
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 6:46 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I congratulate Mr. Graves for using an undoubtedly expensive marble, and making it look like 4' by 8' sheets of formica.
Top of pageBottom of page

Oakmangirl
Member
Username: Oakmangirl

Post Number: 347
Registered: 08-2007
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 10:13 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Mackinaw,

I agree to an extent that the Domino's HQ is wasted land, but let's not forget that Monoghan is a HUGE Wright fan, so anything beyond a ranch or prairie style wouldn't have been an option. He also lives nearby off Warren road, and I swear he owns at least a mile of it. He thinks big!

Besides, I honestly think a tall building there would look out of place, so I give him a little credit. As for the "ranch as farm"; he retained "farm" to honor the history of the area- he bought the Zeeb family farm (c.1925) to build his empire HQ on the land; hey, at least he didn't raze the home. The weird farm animal mélange is separate from the HQ, but they do make strange bedfellows.

I only see bison roaming the range. I'm by no means a Monoghan supporter, but I drive that boring stretch of M14 daily, so I find that his iconoclasm breaks the monotony.

A HQ tidbit:

"This building will be 6/10ths of a mile long when completed, and already boats the world's largest copper roof. At the north end, it bears some resemblance to Mr. Wright's Keys house in Rochester, Minnesota."
Top of pageBottom of page

Gistok
Member
Username: Gistok

Post Number: 5321
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 10:44 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Oakmangirl, IIRC, Tom Monahan wanted to build a tall FLW office tower that had a lean to it (sort of like the Leaning Tower of Pisa), but Ann Arbor Township wouldn't let him build it.

Anyone else remember that? It may have been an addition to the already built sprawling structure, but it was a FLW design that had a lean in the original design.
Top of pageBottom of page

Oakmangirl
Member
Username: Oakmangirl

Post Number: 349
Registered: 08-2007
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 11:02 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gistok,

I don't recall that, though you may be (w)right. (Sorry)

He did build some sort of totem in front based on something FLW called the Golden Tower (not sure of name); maybe this was a compromise?
Top of pageBottom of page

Gistok
Member
Username: Gistok

Post Number: 5323
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 11:35 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I found this article on Domino Farms (that shows the sprawling complex. It also talks about (in the 2nd from last paragraph) a model of the unbuilt leaning tower. That may be the Golden Tower you are referring to.

http://dominosfarms.com/observ er.pdf
Top of pageBottom of page

Gingellgirl
Member
Username: Gingellgirl

Post Number: 49
Registered: 04-2007
Posted on Thursday, September 13, 2007 - 9:49 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gunnar Birkerts
http://eng.archinform.net/arch /825.htm

I'm partial to his St Peter's Lutheran Church in Columbus, Indiana. If you're an architecture aficionado, you must make the trek to Columbus.
Top of pageBottom of page

Oakmangirl
Member
Username: Oakmangirl

Post Number: 355
Registered: 08-2007
Posted on Thursday, September 13, 2007 - 3:02 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gistok,

Interestingly, I think the totem or incomplete tower might be a reference to this crazy idea FLW had to build a mile high skyscraper in Chicago.
Thanks for the link- I thought that ugly blue tower was a sculpture; it's a cell phone tower!
Top of pageBottom of page

Johnlodge
Member
Username: Johnlodge

Post Number: 2384
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Thursday, September 13, 2007 - 3:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

HA, I thought it was a sculpture too. What a strange place.
Top of pageBottom of page

Quinn
Member
Username: Quinn

Post Number: 1466
Registered: 01-2005
Posted on Thursday, September 13, 2007 - 4:22 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hey Gistock here is a rendering from the dia construction site...


d


I just really think the earlier addition was appropriately respectful of history, as mentioned before. Don't get me wrong, I'm very happy they are spending money on the museum, I just think this screams for attention and detracts from the historical, original, classical renaissance structure.
Top of pageBottom of page

Gistok
Member
Username: Gistok

Post Number: 5329
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Thursday, September 13, 2007 - 4:45 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Thanks Quinn,

I need to get down there and take a look at it (can't see the building from the trees!).

I do hope they're not planning on covering the front of the main building with a canopy of trees. It sort of hides the building details, and detracts from the 2 ornamental Camperdowne Elm trees that were imported from Scotland for the front entrance many years ago (I love those 2 trees).
Top of pageBottom of page

Oakmangirl
Member
Username: Oakmangirl

Post Number: 357
Registered: 08-2007
Posted on Thursday, September 13, 2007 - 6:27 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gingellgirl,

I've heard that about Columbus. Is it the diversity that makes it a must see?
Top of pageBottom of page

Quinn
Member
Username: Quinn

Post Number: 1467
Registered: 01-2005
Posted on Thursday, September 13, 2007 - 6:39 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Here's another one...hard to get pictures from their site...so odd!


d
Top of pageBottom of page

Oakmangirl
Member
Username: Oakmangirl

Post Number: 359
Registered: 08-2007
Posted on Thursday, September 13, 2007 - 9:05 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Quinn,

I agree with you. The only thing the new and old will share is a Greco-Roman reference. I find Graves's post-modernism style over the top. He seems to just take an Hellenic detail, like the dentil trim here, and over-exaggerate. I think it ends up looking cartoonish. What is the roof material?

Graves, when he designed the Disney HQ in the 90's, made an exaggerated reference to Greek architecture with huge caryatids in the shapes of the 7 Dwarves- extremely nauseating. He doesn't seem to have progressed much; maybe he's distracted by designing spoons for Target?



Top of pageBottom of page

Quinn
Member
Username: Quinn

Post Number: 1469
Registered: 01-2005
Posted on Thursday, September 13, 2007 - 9:26 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Ugh you've really depressed me now Oakmangirl. Totally agree.

The only thing the museum will have going for it is that is was designed by world-famous architect Graves. Whoopi!
Top of pageBottom of page

Gingellgirl
Member
Username: Gingellgirl

Post Number: 50
Registered: 04-2007
Posted on Friday, September 14, 2007 - 10:09 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Oakmangirl -

There is an amazing amount of architectural styles in Columbus. It reminds me of an older, established city reinventing itself, like London or . . . dare I say it? Detroit.

From the history of Columbus: "In support of the concept that the built environment is crucial to a quality community, the Cummins Engine Foundation offered to pay the architect's fee for any new school that was designed by an architect selected from a list supplied by the Foundation." This later expanded to other public buildings, creating a showcase of American architecture in a small town in the Midwest, of all places.

It's truly a cool city that works. It's worth a visit. Bring your camera.
http://www.columbus.in.us
Top of pageBottom of page

Wirt
Member
Username: Wirt

Post Number: 60
Registered: 12-2005
Posted on Friday, September 14, 2007 - 10:42 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gunnar Birkerts had a tremendous influence on the architecture of this area and nationally in the 70's and first couple years of the 80's. He was one of the vital links from the Saarinen era.
He was one of my heros while in college, but the as times change, sometimes you have to throw out your heros.

I think the Federal Reserve Bank was his best as it was originally designed. It did not 'roll with the changes' and it became obsolete for its use. The structural expression and the monumental plaza was tremendous.
Top of pageBottom of page

Oakmangirl
Member
Username: Oakmangirl

Post Number: 364
Registered: 08-2007
Posted on Friday, September 14, 2007 - 12:12 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I finally was able to link to the UM Bentley Collection of Birkerts's conceptual drawings.

http://bentley.umich.edu/bhl/e xhibits/birkerts/

Does anyone know the history of the Elmwood Project of 1964? It was never realized, but were they supposed to be apartments?

Ggirl, thanks for the Columbus link; I go to Bloomington regularly and have no excuse not to visit!
Top of pageBottom of page

Dialh4hipster
Member
Username: Dialh4hipster

Post Number: 2184
Registered: 11-2004
Posted on Friday, September 14, 2007 - 12:22 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Let's not sell Michael Graves too short. He may be horrendously overexposed but he is practically single-handedly responsible for bringing high design into mainstream consciousness, not to mention that fact he is one of the fathers of an important architectural movement, post-modernism.

Target, which everyone loves so much, would not be selling all those cool cheap things if they hadn't started out with an incredibly successful line designed by him.

And gripe all you will about the museum's new design, but it is incredibly respectful of the original building. Coming from a man who put giant dolphins on a hotel, this is the model of restraint, and some would say too restrained.

I'm not a giant fan of the design. I think that in a city where paying more for exceptional design doesn't really make fiscal sense, and where mediocre-at-best new architecture is the accepted (and embraced) standard, public institutions are the only clients that have a compelling case for making a bold architectural statement. I find this design relatively meek, but I do understand the objective was, basically, to creative something accessible to the masses. The museum is a business, after all.

I do admire Graves' restraint. It is really fascinating to me how the re-cladding hews to such traditional elements yet retains a Graves signature. Some elements that many of you probably haven't seen yet - like the windowed stairwells lit up at night, are quite nice. Of course the outside is just part of the job, the inside's revamped layout may be the real architectural legacy here.

I quite liked the old design of the wings and I'll miss them. But I've come to at least appreciate, if not love, the new look. Of course the wisest thing to do is refrain from forming an opinion until it's all actually finished.

Oh and as for the renovation being so expensive - that was from the asbestos abatement that had to be performed in old wings.
Top of pageBottom of page

Oakmangirl
Member
Username: Oakmangirl

Post Number: 365
Registered: 08-2007
Posted on Friday, September 14, 2007 - 12:49 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Digital,

For Graves, it is restrained, given his other work, I'm glad for it. However, I think an art museum of all places should make more of a statement just not with him. I would have liked to see what Gehry would have designed. Who was in the original design running, I forget?

Well, the interior sounds beautiful, and at least we won't have a habitrail like the Pompidou Centre. :-)
Top of pageBottom of page

Gistok
Member
Username: Gistok

Post Number: 5332
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Friday, September 14, 2007 - 1:39 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Well said Dialh4hipster. You and I don't always see eye-to-eye on modern architecture, but I am looking forward to visiting the museum to check out some of your commented areas.

Oakmangirl... the Pompidou Centre in Paris.... the best comparison I can think of is a modern version of Detroit's Dodge Main Plant, except it's made of glass. Parisians tend to like it... but then they also decided to build a brand new opera house (Bastille Opera House), when they already had the world's greatest opulent opera house (the 1875 Garnier Opera House). Go figure?

Also I just read up on those 2 fancy Camperdown Elm trees in front of the DIA in Wikipedia. They all originated from grafts of a Elm tree in Dundee Scotland that had a mutant branch, discovered on an estate there circa 1835-40. Very interesting!
Top of pageBottom of page

Sumotect
Member
Username: Sumotect

Post Number: 277
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Friday, September 14, 2007 - 2:56 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gunnar was probably the most influential architect to come out of the Detroit area (by way of Latvia) since Ero Saarinen. He had a national and global presence. He always seemed to be listed in the top five of the world’s best Architects. He was doing great work when hardly anyone was doing great work. I liked his earlier work with the strong geometry and integrated concept, character, and image. His later more “organic” work seems a little idiosyncratic, and too personal.

Sadly, he and many of his projects are out of fashion at the present time, and are now suffering from a profound lack of respect. We seem to get all excited when old buildings get threatened, but when one by a modern master is threatened we just can’t seem to get up for the fight. It is probably due to the inability of modernist ideals to captivate a public that is now fearful of the future, and looking back to the times when we were strong, rich, and confident.

What I learned from him, and others also, was that architecture had to have an idea, and ought to mean something. Much of architecture today is about “fashion”, mediagenics, and “LEED points”.

I understand he (Birkerts) has moved away and is almost totally retired, and not in the best of health. I imagine that turning the DIA into a kind of Somerset Mall, may have been the last straw.

When one looks globally at all the fantastic museum work that has been done over the last ten years the DIA remodeling is something of a disappointment. Ironically it may now be Graves turn to sink into obscurity.
Top of pageBottom of page

Oakmangirl
Member
Username: Oakmangirl

Post Number: 366
Registered: 08-2007
Posted on Friday, September 14, 2007 - 4:01 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Much of architecture today is about “fashion”, mediagenics, and “LEED points”.

This is precisely my beef with Graves. I hope our museum doesn't turn into one that measures success by hosting $20, timed entry, blockbuster exhibits. As for Graves sinking into obscurity, I think as an architect, he's already seen his glory days, and I think his designs already seem dated- why else would he design, beyond the obvious payout, for Target? I guess maybe he designs everything from a populist perspective.

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.